Effects of political institutions on air quality
By T. Bernauer, V. Koubi. 2009
434 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a3d178388791bb04111e91f558c1fb577ee0bbea
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Keming Yu
- Huiming Zhu
- Marina Povitkina
- Wanhai You
- T. Bernauer
- Tobias Böhmelt
- M. Paterson
- E. Lachapelle
Citations in the corpus
- The limits of democracy in tackling climate change (2018, background): “The existing literature has comprehensively summarized arguments on how democracy can benefit or harm environmental commitments (see e.g. Li and Reuveny 2006, Bättig and Bernauer 2009, Bernauer and Koubi 2009, Spilker 2013, Sjöstedt and Jagers 2014).”
- Money Makes the EU Go Round: The Objective Foundations of Conflict in the Council of Ministers (2015, neutral): “…emissions per capita as operationalization of the environmental interests of a government since sulphur oxides are produced by human activity, subject to government regulations and recognized as a crucial environmental indicator and criteria pollutant by the World Bank (Bernauer and Koubi, 2009).”
- Democracy, Financial Openness, and Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Heterogeneity Across Existing Emission Levels (2015, methodology): “Using a panel dataset of 107 cities in 42 countries over the period 1971-1996, Bernauer and Koubi (2009) find that democracies and especially presidential systems have a positive effect on air quality.”
- National Institutions and Global Public Goods: Are Democracies More Cooperative in Climate Change Policy? (2009, background): “In focusing on the implications of democracy for the provision of global public goods, this article addresses an important gap in the international relations and comparative politics literature+ The latter deals primarily with the effects of democracy on domestic public goods provision and dyadic in”
- The political economy of passing climate change legislation: Evidence from a survey (2015, background): “Lachapelle and Paterson (2013), Bernauer and Koubi (2009) and Fredriksson et al. (2005) test these theories empirically.”