Using the Internet for survey research: A case study
By Yin Zhang. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 2000
345 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a3c0744d3b869fb2dde7f8a6f7ba8a84c8edb54f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Dorine Andrews
- Blair Nonnecke
- J. Preece
- Gunther Eysenbach
- S. Galea
- J. Wyatt
- Melissa Tracy
- Joanne L. Nobile
Citations in the corpus
- Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. (2007, background): “For example, some mixed mode studies give respondents the option of completing data collection in one of multiple ways, usually via mail or via the Internet (115, 117).”
- Electronic Survey Methodology: A Case Study in Reaching Hard-to-Involve Internet Users (2003, background): “However, the Internet user male–female gap has disappeared (NUA, 2001), whereas economics, age, and ethnicity continue to produce significant gaps between online and offline populations (Yun & Trumbo, 2000; Zhang, 2000).”
- Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Research Surveys: Evidence from the Literature (2002, unknown): “Their only significant advantage over paper was a potential decrease in delivery and response times, although some also hypothesized that the novelty of the new medium might enhance response rates (Parker 1992; Zhang 2000).”
- Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research (2002, background): “Electronic interviews and surveys (`e-surveys') are emerging scientific research methodologies, pioneered by communication scientists, sociologists, and psychologists, although their use for health-related research is still in its infancy [4-10].”
- The Fallacy of Online Surveys: No Data Are Better Than Bad Data (2010, background): “Lack of control over the survey sample caused by stakeholder bias and unverified respondents can compromise the validity of online surveys and has been discussed in the literature (Bethlehem, 2008; Couper, 2000; Dillman et al., 2009; Vaske, 2008; Zhang, 1999).”