Smart cities in perspective – a comparative European study by means of self-organizing maps

301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Smart cities with big data: Reference models, challenges, and considerations (2018, background): “…maintenance, security monitoring (Harrison et al., 2010), learning, creativity (Komninos, 2011), knowledge intensiveness, high productivity (Kourtit, Nijkamp, & Arribas, 2012), smart economy, smart people, smart governance, smart mobility, smart environment, and smart living (Lombardi,…”
Territorial capital, smart tourism specialization and sustainable regional development: experiences from Europe. (2017, background): “The concepts of “smartness” emerged in the literature, both at the urban scale – the smart city (Kourtit et al., 2012; Caragliu and Del Bo, 2012) – or at the regional level – like the “smart specialization” (Foray et al., 2012; McCann & Ortega-Argilés, 2015) – enlarging the scope of sustainable…”
The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism (2013, background): “…and supra-national states such as the European Union, smart cities offer the enticing potential of socio-economic progress—more liveable, secure, functional, competitive and sustainable cities, and the renewal of urban centres as hubs of innovation and work (Kourtit et al. 2012; Townsend 2013).”
The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review (2018, background): “, “maximize the socio-economic and ecological performance of cities” (Kourtit et al., 2012)).”