Selecting a suitable time step for discrete element simulations that use the central difference time integration scheme
By Catherine O'Sullivan, J. Bray. 2004
316 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Control and Systems Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a3873d18753872d8707d870235ab7205ae347a56
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
In Computational Mechanics
In Control and Systems Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- MATERIAL AND INTERACTION PROPERTIES OF SELECTED GRAINS AND OILSEEDS FOR MODELING DISCRETE PARTICLES (2010, methodology): “The model must use a critical time increment that achieves stability and simulates the true phys‐ ics with a manageable number of calculations (O'Sullivan and Bray, 2004; Li et al., 2005).”
- Discrete element method for modelling solid and particulate materials (2007, unknown): “Related to our approach here is the work of O’Sullivan and Bray [25] for determining a critical time step size.”
- A coupled FEM/DEM approach for hierarchical multiscale modelling of granular media (2014, methodology): “The kinematics of the particles follows the Newton’s law of motion and the positions of particles are updated using a time-marching scheme, which requires a critical time step to ensure numerical stability for DEM computations estimated by [41]”
- A bond model for DEM simulation of cementitious materials and deformable structures (2014, methodology): “The critical time step for bonded contacts is estimated from an approximate solution based on a single degree of freedom in a mass spring system [40]:”