Avoiding Collisions in Flocks
By Felipe Cucker, Jiu‐Gang Dong. 2010
208 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Mechanical Engineering, Molecular Biology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Mechanical Engineering
- Medhi Bennis
- Jihong Park
- Hamid Shiri
- Seung‐Yeal Ha
- Shinmi Ahn
- Hyesung Kim
- Seong-Lyun Kim
- Heesun Choi
In Molecular Biology
Citations in the corpus
- On collision-avoiding initial configurations to Cucker-Smale type flocking models (2012, methodology): “When the communication weight is adopted as a singular type, say 1 rα , α>0, the forcing terms become singular in the original C-S model and its variants [7, 29].”
- A General Collision-Avoiding Flocking Framework (2011, background): “Our main result, Theorem 1 below, thus extends the results in both [3] and [8].”
- Flocking of multi‐agent dynamical systems with intermittent nonlinear velocity measurements (2012, background): “Recently, the problem of flocking control in multi-agent systems has attracted increasing attention, which can be generally described as how to design distributed feedback algorithms based only on local information to guarantee the whole group to organize into a global flocking behavior [5–30].”
- Extension of the Cucker-Smale Control Law to Space Flight Formations (2009, unknown): “3 6:7 10 10 10 [0–300] 35.”
- Massive Autonomous UAV Path Planning: A Neural Network Based Mean-Field Game Theoretic Approach (2019, methodology): “In view of this, we adopt the CuckerSmale flocking [1], [14] that reduces the relative velocities for the UAVs.”
- Massive UAV-to-Ground Communication and its Stable Movement Control: A Mean-Field Approach (2018, methodology): “The flocking cost follows from the Cucker-Smale (CS) flocking algorithm that guarantees the velocity convergence within a finite time span [10].”