Effects of riparian arthropod predation on the biomass and abundance of aquatic insect emergence
By Achim Paetzold, Klement Tockner. Journal of The North American Benthological Society, 2005
97 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a367c1fe47935ad46466bac49508a750fc0b9946
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- S. Findlay
- David L. Strayer
- Klement Tockner
- Achim Paetzold
- P. S. Lake
- Andrea Ballinger
- J. F. Bernet
- M. Vinarski
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- David L. Strayer
- S. Findlay
- Klement Tockner
- Achim Paetzold
- P. S. Lake
- Andrea Ballinger
- J. F. Bernet
- Daniel L. Graf
Citations in the corpus
- Energy and nutrient fluxes from rivers and streams into terrestrial food webs (2006, background): “Aquatic insects constitute a major component of the diet of carabid beetles (Hering and Plachter 1997; Hering 1998; Paetzold and Tockner 2005), wandering riparian spiders (e.”
- Ecology of freshwater shore zones (2010, background): “terrestrial predators in the shore zone, including carabid beetles, spiders, insectivorous birds, and bats (Backlund 1945; McLachlan 1983; Gray 1993; Paetzold and Tockner 2005; Paetzold et al. 2005; Smith et al. 2004, 2007).”
- Consumer-specific responses to riverine subsidy pulses in a riparian arthropod assemblage (2006, background): “The biomass of the subsidy addition was approximately 2–10 times the average biomass of aquatic insect emergence on the gravel bank (Paetzold & Tockner, 2005).”