Islamic vs. Conventional Banking: Business Model, Efficiency and Stability

By Thorsten Beck, Asli Demirgüç-Kunt, O. Merrouche. 2010

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper discusses Islamic banking products and interprets them in the context of financial intermediation theory. Anecdotal evidence shows that many of the conventional products can be redrafted as Sharia-compliant products, so that the differences are smaller than expected. Comparing conventional and Islamic banks and controlling for other bank and country characteristics, the authors find few significant differences in business orientation, efficiency, asset quality, or stability. While Islamic banks seem more cost-effective than conventional banks in a broad cross-country sample, this finding reverses in a sample of countries with both Islamic and conventional banks. However, conventional banks that operate in countries with a higher market share of Islamic banks are more cost-effective but less stable. There is also consistent evidence of higher capitalization of Islamic banks and this capital cushion plus higher liquidity reserves explains the relatively better performance of Islamic banks during the recent crisis.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a3499a41ff47d39ff2c764716e83cc04add470f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

  1. Pejman Abedifar
  2. Amine Tarazi
  3. Iftekhar Hasan
  4. M. Asutay
  5. L. Lepetit
  6. Frank Strobel
  7. Abul Shamsuddin
  8. Phil Molyneux

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Iftekhar Hasan
  2. Amine Tarazi
  3. Pejman Abedifar
  4. D. Godil
  5. Salman Sarwat
  6. M. Asutay
  7. Kittisak Jermsittiparsert
  8. Arshian Sharif

Citations in the corpus