The Relationship between Traditional Ecological Knowledge, Evolving Cultures, and Wilderness Protection in the Circumpolar North

By A. Watson, Lilian Alessa, B. Glaspell. 2003

83 citations recorded by the source corpus.

There are many unique issues associated with natural resource management in the far north as a result of legislative direction, historic settlement and occupation patterns, northern cultural traditions, ecotourism, economic depression, pressures for energy development, and globalization and modernization effects. Wilderness designation in Canada, the USA, and Finland is aimed at preserving and restoring many human and ecological values, as are the long-established, strictly enforced, nature reserves in Russia. In Alaska and Finland, and in some provinces of Canada, there is a variety of values associated with protecting relatively intact relationships between indigenous people and relatively pristine, vast ecosystems. These values are often described as "traditional means of livelihood," "traditional means of access," "traditional relationships with nature," or "traditional lifestyles." Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) forms part of these relationships and has been acknowledged as a contributor to understanding the effects of management decisions and human-use impacts on long-term ecological composition, structure, and function. Wilderness protection can help maintain opportunities to continue traditional relationships with nature. As cultures continue to evolve in customs, attitudes, knowledge, and technological uses, values associated with both TEK and relationships with relatively pristine ecosystems will also evolve. Understanding these relationships and how to consider them in wilderness protection and restoration decision making is potentially one of the most contentious, widespread natural resource management issues in the circumpolar north.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a347d642195e058b5b6343fee4288641f9db6092

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Sociology and Political Science

T. Crane

Citations in the corpus

Rewilding – A New Paradigm for Nature Conservation in Scotland? (2011, background): “Once again, this was extensively presaged by belief systems around the world which represented humankind as one member of an inter-reliant ecological system (Egerton 2001; Swearer 2001; Watson et al. 2003; Martin et al. 2010).”
Of Models and Meanings: Cultural Resilience in Social–Ecological Systems (2010, background): “There is also ample literature that acknowledges the validity of normative cultural valuation of landscapes, natural resources, and livelihood practices (Watson et al. 2003, Xu et al. 2005, Bottom et al. 2009), as well as the " social limitations of adaptations " (Adger et al. 2009).”