Describing breeding territories of migratory passerines: suggestions for sampling, choice of estimator, and delineation of core areas

By Jennifer J. Barg, Jason M. Jones, R. Robertson. 2005

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a342c866cd06a00a17b8d9bf2b143b0b3ae8c893

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. E. Gese
2. E. Nilsen
3. J. Linnell
4. S. Cavalcanti
5. Mathias Tobler
6. G. Powell

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. S. Cavalcanti
2. J. Linnell
3. E. Gese

Citations in the corpus

• Spatial Ecology and Social Interactions of Jaguars (Panthera Onca) in the Southern Pantanal, Brazil (2009, methodology): “…depictions of space use, we examined jaguar home ranges and their overlap using the 90% and 50% adaptive kernel estimator (Worton 1989) because this method has advantages over the minimum convex polygon method (Barg et al. 2005; Harris et al. 1990; Kenward et al. 2001; Seaman and Powell 1996).”
• Can minimum convex polygon home ranges be used to draw biologically meaningful conclusions? (2008, result): “…use the KDE rather than the MCP (including detecting core areas [see, e.g., Barg et al. 2005) and resource selection (see, e.g., Millspaugh et al. 2006)], we concur with the suggestion of Barg et al. (2005) and Borger et al. (2006a) that use of the MCP should be avoided in most ecological studies.”