Diffuse Optical Light in Galaxy Clusters. II. Correlations with Cluster Properties

By J. Krick, R. Bernstein. 2007

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We have measured the flux, profile, color, and substructure in the diffuse intracluster light (ICL) in a sample of 10 galaxy clusters with a range of mass, morphology, redshift, and density. Deep, wide-field observations for this project were made in two bands at the 1 m Swope and 2.5 m du Pont telescopes at Las Campanas Observatory. Careful attention in reduction and analysis was paid to the illumination correction, background subtraction, point-spread function determination, and galaxy subtraction. ICL flux is detected in both bands in all 10 clusters ranging from 7.6 × 1010 to 7.0 × 1011 h L⊙ in r and 1.4 × 1010 to 1.2 × 1011 h L⊙ in the B band. These fluxes account for 6%-22% of the total cluster light within one-quarter of the virial radius in r and 4%-21% in the B band. Average ICL B - r colors range from 1.5 to 2.8 mag when k- and evolution corrected to the present epoch. In several clusters we also detect ICL in group environments near the cluster center and up to 1 h Mpc distant from the cluster center. Our sample, having been selected from the Abell sample, is incomplete in that it does not include high-redshift clusters with low density, low flux, or low mass, and it does not include low-redshift clusters with high flux, high mass, or high density. This bias makes it difficult to interpret correlations between ICL flux and cluster properties. Despite this selection bias, we do find that the presence of a cD galaxy corresponds to both centrally concentrated galaxy profiles and centrally concentrated ICL profiles. This is consistent with ICL either forming from galaxy interactions at the center or forming at earlier times in groups and later combining in the center.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a341b84210a38979a1fd1f3423edae4c9317d74d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. Joop Schaye
  3. R. Dav'e
  4. Volker Springel
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. R. Somerville
  7. P. Capak
  8. A. Koekemoer

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. A. Koekemoer
  2. T. O. S. University
  3. Joop Schaye
  4. M. Blanton
  5. C. Booth
  6. R. Bender
  7. M. White
  8. J. Bregman

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Capak
  2. Mara Salvato
  3. A. Koekemoer
  4. O. Ilbert
  5. Joop Schaye
  6. P. Hopkins
  7. N. Scoville
  8. H. McCracken

Citations in the corpus