Capital adequacy and lending and deposit behaviors of conventional and Islamic banks
By Abdul Mastura, Karim, M. Kabir Hassan, Taufiq Hassan, S. Mohamad. 2014
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a33475b6df018cfd97821d27d96aa1f08c4d020c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Fotios Pasiouras
- Fadzlan Sufian
- S. Aliyu
- Nasri Naiimi
- Rosylin Mohd. Yusof
- M. K. Hassan
- Iftekhar Hasan
- Sailesh Tanna
In Economics and Econometrics
In Finance
- Fotios Pasiouras
- Fadzlan Sufian
- S. Aliyu
- M. K. Hassan
- Iftekhar Hasan
- Michael Doumpos
- Sailesh Tanna
- Peterson K. Ozili
Citations in the corpus
- Bank overall financial strength: Islamic versus conventional banks (2017, background): “Other studies compare the financial ratios of the banks, focusing on individual aspects like capital adequacy (Beck et al., 2013), deposits and loans growth (Karim et al., 2014), credit risk (Kabir et al., 2015), bank insolvency risk (Bourkhis and Nabi, 2013), and profitability (Beck et al., 2013).”
- Islamic Banking Sustainability: A Review of Literature and Directions for Future Research (2016, background): “It is empirically clear that capital adequacy influences deposit and loan growth of the banks, which in turn extended to their survival in the system (Abdul Karim et al. 2014).”