Diversity and composition of Amazonian moths in primary, secondary and plantation forests

By J. Hawes, C. Motta, W. L. Overal, Jos Barlow, T. Gardner, C. A. Peres. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 2009

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a33351caa85b51b2a73bc9bc8c29bb9c39c554ad

Citations in the corpus

• Macro‐moth families differ in their attraction to light: implications for light‐trap monitoring programmes (2014, unknown): “Although the effects of light-trap characteristics and environmental factors on the abundance and species composition of moth samples have been well studied (see above), very little is known about the distances at which moths respond to light traps (Ricketts et al., 2001; Hawes et al., 2009; Truxa &”
• The PREDICTS database: a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts (2014, unknown): “…174 Clarke et al. 2005; 175 Sedlock et al. 2008; 176 Verdasca et al. 2012; 177 D’Aniello et al. 2011; 178 Berg et al. 2011; 179 Summerville et al. 2006; 180 Hawes et al. 2009; 181 Cleary and Mooers 2006; 182 Krauss et al. 2003; 183 Ishitani et al. 2003; 184 Safian et al. 2011; 185 Furlani et…”