Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty

By T. Victor, J. Harbluk, J. Engström. 2005

547 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a31f02185c7ff94b80d6707b591ecd0aad41d399

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Driver performance effects of simultaneous visual and cognitive distraction and adaptation behavior (2012, background): “The most direct effects of visual distraction were demonstrated by eye tracking measures, including increased off-road glances and glance durations (Victor et al., 2005).”
Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions (2013, background): “PRC has previously been demonstrated to be a sensitive indicator of visual distraction (Victor et al., 2005) with lower values indicating less attention is focused towards the visual demand of driving.”
Review of eye-related measures of drivers’ mental workload (2015, background): “Over the years, many parameters characterising eye fixations have been studied in relation with driver’s mental workload, including number of fixations, fixation duration, number of saccades, saccadic duration, saccadic amplitude, peak of saccadic velocity, and gaze distribution [6], [13-18].”
Sensitivity of Physiological Measures for Detecting Systematic Variations in Cognitive Demand From a Working Memory Task (2012, background): “The issue of subject disengagement at the most difficult task level raised by Victor et al. (2005) may account for some of the apparent lack of sensitivity between task levels observed in the HASTE project.”
Driving context and visual-manual phone tasks influence glance behavior in naturalistic driving (2014, background): “Tijerina et al. (2004) specifically studied car-following, while other studies did not specify the presence of other vehicles (Rockwell, 1988; Victor et al., 2005).”
Transition to manual: driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle (2014, background): “In particular, we investigated the time taken by drivers to resume manual control of the drive and refocus their attention towards the road centre, the location of most driving-related hazards (Victor et al., 2005).”