ON THE REDSHIFT EVOLUTION OF THE Lyα ESCAPE FRACTION AND THE DUST CONTENT OF GALAXIES

By M. Hayes, Daniel Schaerer, G. Östlin, J. Mas-Hesse, H. Atek, D. Kunth. 2010

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The Lyα emission line has been proven to be a powerful tool for studying evolving galaxies at the highest redshift. However, in order to use Lyα as a physical probe of galaxies, it becomes vital to know the Lyα escape fraction (fLyαesc). Unfortunately, due to the resonant nature of Lyα, fLyαesc may vary unpredictably and requires empirical measurement. Here, we compile Lyα luminosity functions (LFs) between redshifts z = 0 and 8 and, combined with Hα and ultraviolet data, assess how fLyαesc evolves with redshift. We find a strong upward evolution in fLyαesc over the range z = 0.3–6, which is well fit by the power law fLyαesc∝(1 + z)ξwith ξ = (2.57+0.19−0.12). This predicts that fLyαesc should reach unity at z = 11.1. By comparing fLyαesc and EB−V in individual galaxies we derive an empirical relationship between fLyαesc and EB−V, which includes resonance scattering and can explain the redshift evolution of fLyαesc between z = 0 and 6 purely as a function of the evolution in the dust content of galaxies. Beyond z ≈ 6.5, fLyαesc drops more substantially, an effect attributed to either ionizing photon leakage, or an increase in the neutral gas fraction of the intergalactic medium. While distinguishing between these two scenarios may be extremely challenging, by framing the problem this way we remove the uncertainty of the halo mass from Lyα-based tests of reionization. We finally derive a new method by which to estimate the dust content of galaxies, based purely upon the observed Lyα and UV LFs. These data are characterized by an exponential with an e-folding scale of zEBV ≈ 3.4.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a31e9f85080d631f01b828a26d71ec97be574a9e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Richard S. Ellis
  2. P. Oesch
  3. R. Bouwens
  4. J. Dunlop
  5. P. Hopkins
  6. M. Ouchi
  7. G. Illingworth
  8. L. Hernquist

In Instrumentation

  1. Richard S. Ellis
  2. R. Bouwens
  3. P. Oesch
  4. J. Dunlop
  5. G. Illingworth
  6. P. V. van Dokkum
  7. C. Conroy
  8. M. Franx

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. M. Ouchi
  2. J. Newman
  3. R. Somerville
  4. K. Nakajima
  5. T. Shibuya
  6. Y. Harikane
  7. M. Malkan
  8. A. Mesinger

Citations in the corpus