Modeling silviculture after natural disturbance to sustain biodiversity in the longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) ecosystem: balancing complexity and implementation

By Brian Palik, Robert J. Mitchell, John Kevin Hiers. 2002

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a31382bfef9400c786a44395ee338bcf2a768590

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Competitive responses of seedlings and understory plants in longleaf pine woodlands: separating canopy influences above and below ground (2007, background): “…studies which suggest that competitive exclusion of seedlings requires gap-based silviculture (Brockway and Outcalt 1998; Brockway et al. 2005) and those which suggest that single-tree-selection approaches might be suitable for longleaf pine woodlands (McGuire et al. 2001; Palik et al. 2002).”
Characteristics of gaps and natural regeneration in mature longleaf pine flatwoods ecosystems (2003, background): “To achieve adequate longleaf pine regeneration, minimum gap sizes of 1400 m2 have been recommended for mesic uplands (Palik et al., 1997, 2002) and 1250 m2 for xeric sandhills (Brockway and Outcalt, 1998).”
Impact of bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) disturbance on timber production and carbon sequestration in different management strategies under climate change (2008, background): “This, together with an increased understanding of ecosystem processes, has promoted an alternative view on natural disturbances, and mimicking natural disturbance regimes is proposed as key component of an ecosystem oriented management approach (e.g., Niemelä, 1999; Franklin et al., 2002; Palik et a”
INITIAL RESPONSES OF FOREST UNDERSTORIES TO VARYING LEVELS AND PATTERNS OF GREEN-TREE RETENTION (2005, background): “…of the frequency, size, and spatial distribution of disturbance, and of the types and amounts of live and dead structures that are retained through disturbance (Arnott and Beese 1997, Bergeron and Harvey 1997, Coates et al. 1997, Fries et al. 1997, Franklin et al. 2002, Palik et al. 2002).”
Contemporary forest restoration: A review emphasizing function (2014, background): “For many forest types, simplification of structure relative to historic reference conditions is an unanticipated (or sometimes intended) outcome of management that may have spanned decades (Palik et al., 2002).”
Spatial patterns of regeneration in managed uneven-aged ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir forests of Western Montana, USA (2006, background): “However, under the low reserve stocking levels typical of individual tree selection guidelines for various intolerant pine species (Baker et al., 1996; Fiedler et al., 1988; Palik et al., 2002; Shelton and Cain, 2000), initial establishment of regeneration is often more diffuse across the stand.”