Synaptic Consolidation: From Synapses to Behavioral Modeling
By Lorric Ziegler, Friedemann Zenke, David B. Kastner, Wulfram Gerstner. 2015
55 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Synaptic plasticity, a key process for memory formation, manifests itself across different time scales ranging from a few seconds for plasticity induction up to hours or even years for consolidation and memory retention. We developed a three-layered model of synaptic consolidation that accounts for data across a large range of experimental conditions. Consolidation occurs in the model through the interaction of the synaptic efficacy with a scaffolding variable by a read-write process mediated by a tagging-related variable. Plasticity-inducing stimuli modify the efficacy, but the state of tag and scaffold can only change if a write protection mechanism is overcome. Our model makes a link from depotentiation protocols in vitro to behavioral results regarding the influence of novelty on inhibitory avoidance memory in rats.
Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Walter Senn
- Michael H. Herzog
- Pascal Leimer
- Stefano Fusi
- Wulfram Gerstner
- Marcus K. Benna
- Johanni Brea
- Dane S. Corneil
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Wulfram Gerstner
- Walter Senn
- Stefano Fusi
- Pascal Leimer
- Michael H. Herzog
- Marcus K. Benna
- Johanni Brea
- Dane S. Corneil
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Wulfram Gerstner
- Walter Senn
- Stefano Fusi
- Michael H. Herzog
- Pascal Leimer
- Marcus K. Benna
- Johanni Brea
- Dane S. Corneil
Citations in the corpus
- Synaptic weight decay with selective consolidation enables fast learning without catastrophic forgetting (2019, methodology): “We suggest a normative theory of synaptic consolidation that functionally reproduces the phenomena of the multi-state models of tagging & capture (Barrett et al., 2009; Clopath et al., 2008; Ziegler et al., 2015).”
- Eligibility Traces and Plasticity on Behavioral Time Scales: Experimental Support of NeoHebbian Three-Factor Learning Rules (2018, background): “However, slightly more involved models where the visible weight depends on both the synaptic tag variable and the long-term stable weight (Clopath et al., 2008; Ziegler et al., 2015) correctly account for the time course of the measured synaptic weights in consolidation experiments (Frey andMorris, ”
- Computational models of long term plasticity and memory (2017, background): “Phenomenological models [Clopath et al., 2008, Barrett et al., 2009, Ziegler et al., 2015] of STC comprise all four steps, and can explain experiments on the induction of protein synthesis dependent late LTP.”
- Computational principles of biological memory (2015, background): “03). These biochemical processes could be localized in individual synapses, and recent phenomenological models indicate that at least three such variables are needed to describe experimental findings (Ziegler et al., 2015). However, these processes could also be distributed across different compartme”