An Analysis of the Performance of the UFAM Pulsed Doppler Lidar for Observing the Boundary Layer
By G. Pearson, F. Davies, C. Collier. 2009
311 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a30ec7226ae0f945390e87728721326f64e8e225
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- Robin J. Hogan
- B. Grisogono
- B. Galperin
- Ewan J. O'Connor
- Jielun Sun
- A. Grachev
- Anthony Illingworth
- Julien Delanoë
In Environmental Engineering
In Global and Planetary Change
- Robin J. Hogan
- Anthony Illingworth
- B. Grisogono
- B. Galperin
- Ewan J. O'Connor
- Jielun Sun
- A. Grachev
- Julien Delanoë
Citations in the corpus
- Vertical velocity variance and skewness in clear and cloud‐topped boundary layers as revealed by Doppler lidar (2009, background): “The accuracy of the Doppler velocity is around 3–4 cm s−1 at high signalto-noise ratios (Pearson et al., 2009).”
- A Method for Estimating the Turbulent Kinetic Energy Dissipation Rate from a Vertically Pointing Doppler Lidar, and Independent Evaluation from Balloon-Borne In Situ Measurements (2010, unknown): “Pearson et al. (2009) suggested a value of 1.5 m s 2 1 for D y , our results indicate that 2 m s 2 1 is more suitable and we select this as a typical value for the rest of the paper.”
- Review of wave‐turbulence interactions in the stable atmospheric boundary layer (2015, background): “the aerosol backscatter conditions [Grund et al., 2001; Pearson et al., 2009].”