Tobit Models in Social Science Research

By Douglas A. Smith, Robert W. Brame. 2003

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a2f02befb9165b9919718e8385a2863cba7eb5cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Bangon Sirisunyaluck
2. Xiaohe Xu
3. Kent Kerley
4. Cortney A. Franklin
5. Owen Gallupe
6. Stephen W. Baron

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring and Explaining Charge Bargaining (2007, unknown): “9 For more detail on the Tobit model see Smith and Brame (2003) and Osgood et al. (2002). our results are driven by these assumptions, we will also estimate a probit model of the incarceration/non-incarceration decision (see Sect.”
• Self-Control, Intimate Partner Abuse, and Intimate Partner Victimization: Testing the General Theory of Crime in Thailand (2008, background): “Although the tobit estimator is both consistent and asymptotically efficient, several scholars have recently suggested that the tobit assumption should be explicitly tested (Smith and Brame 2003 ).”