The occurrence of arboreal mammals in the rain forest fragments in the Anamalai Hills, south India

By G. Umapathy, Ajith T. T. Kumar. 2000

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a2ecc4aec16ee1407ec8515a696427797f449155

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Resource partitioning and interspecific interactions among sympatric rain forest arboreal mammals of the Western Ghats, India (2006, methodology): “Except for LTM, the other species are habitat generalists (Singh et al., 1997b; Umapathy and Kumar, 2000).”
Anthropogenic determinants of primate and carnivore local extinctions in a fragmented forest landscape of southern Amazonia (2005, background): “, 2002), only eight studies to date have reported primate species counts in five or more forest fragments (Marsh, 2003), with 24 being the largest number of forest patches investigated within a given region (Umapathy and Kumar, 1992).”
Conservation Value of Landscape Supplementation for Howler Monkeys Living in Forest Patches (2009, background): “Among other things, forest fragmentation limits the availability of food resources (Zanette et al. 2000, Arroyo-Rodŕıguez & Mandujano 2006).”
Accuracy of resource selection functions across spatial scales (2006, background): “For example, urbanization and roads fragment wolf and bear habitat or increase risk of mortality (Mladenoff et al., 1999; Naves et al., 2003) but may have little effect on small bird or mammal populations contained within a fragment (Umapathy & Kumar, 2000).”
The mammalian communities in coffee plantations around a protected area in the Western Ghats, India (2007, background): “(c) We conducted night transects along existing trails, using a spotlight for detecting nocturnal mammals (Umapathy and Kumar, 2000).”
Feeding Ecology of Propithecus diadema in Forest Fragments and Continuous Forest (2008, background): “Many researchers have shown that primate species vary in their ability to persist in fragments (Ganzhorn et al. 2000a, b; Gilbert and Setz 2001; Marsh 2003; Onderdonk and Chapman 2000; Tutin et al. 1997; Umapathy and Kumar 2000a ).”
The importance of functional connectivity in the conservation of a ground-dwelling mammal in an urban Australian landscape (2007, methodology): “Definition and selection of fragments A fragment was defined as an area of remnant and/or re-growth forest vegetation isolated from other such forested areas, excluding the presence of narrow (\15-m wide) vegetation corridors that connected some neighbouring patches (after Umapathy and Kumar 2000).”
Effects of Habitat Structure and Adjacent Habitats on Birds in Tropical Rainforest Fragments and Shaded Plantations in the Western Ghats, India (2006, background): “These fragments are vital for conservation as they contain significant proportions of the native fauna ( Umapathy and Kumar 2000 ) and provide landscape-level connectivity between patches critical for wide-ranging species such as the Great Hornbill (Buceros bicornis, Raman and Mudappa 2003b), Asian ”