Designing and recasting LHC analyses with MadAnalysis 5
By É. Conte, B. Dumont, Benjamin Fuks, C. Wymant. 2014
294 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We present an extension of the expert mode of the MadAnalysis 5 program dedicated to the design or reinterpretation of high-energy physics collider analyses. We detail the predefined classes, functions and methods available to the user and emphasize the most recent developments. The latter include the possible definition of multiple sub-analyses and a novel user-friendly treatment for the selection criteria. We illustrate this approach by two concrete examples: a CMS search for supersymmetric partners of the top quark and a phenomenological analysis targeting hadronically decaying monotop systems.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a2e5237a25d644e533a8ef36620143437595b58d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Felix Kahlhoefer
- M. Drewes
- É. Conte
- E. Salvioni
- M. Ramsey-Musolf
- K. Schmidt-Hoberg
- N. Craig
- P. Schuster
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Atlas Collaboration
- Felix Kahlhoefer
- Benjamin Fuks
- M. Bauer
- É. Conte
- D. Curtin
- Michael J. Reece
- N. Craig
Citations in the corpus
- Searching for long-lived particles beyond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider (2019, methodology): “from multiple third-party tools such as Rivet BSM, CheckMate or MadAnalysis [488, 489] as well as from multiple Figure 85.”
- Simplified dark matter models with two Higgs doublets: I. Pseudoscalar mediators (2017, methodology): “The results of the CheckMATE 2 analyses have been validated against MadAnalysis 5 [105, 106].”
- Collider limits on new physics within micrOMEGAs4.3 (2016, unknown): “When the underlying assumptions that enter the simplified models interpretation are too restrictive to probe some parameter space of a model, more comprehensive recasting codes such as CheckMate [26,27] or MadAnalysis 5 [28,29], should be used instead.”
- Constraining dark sectors with monojets and dijets (2015, methodology): “10 We finally employ FastJet v3 [77] for jet reconstruction, and MadAnalysis v5 [78] for cuts and data analysis.”