Blur: How to Know What's True in the Age of Information Overload

By Bill Kovach, Tom Rosenstiel. 2010

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a2d4b3a18f9bdfb4b182d6a7c7068065b3b15b90

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Niall Conroy
2. Yimin Chen
3. Victoria L. Rubin
4. Andrea G. Parker
5. Yixuan Zhang
6. Qianni Luo
7. M. de Choudhury
8. Jiawei Zhou

Citations in the corpus

• Synthetic Lies: Understanding AI-Generated Misinformation and Evaluating Algorithmic and Human Solutions (2023, methodology): “Cite sources Sources of information are cited [7, 56, 113, 114] “The University of Vienna has sent a memo””
• The head and heart of news avoidance: How attitudes about the news media relate to levels of news consumption (2021, background): “While all can create content about current events and can even look very similar, not all adhere to journalistic standards (Kovach and Rosenstiel, 2010).”
• Deception detection for news: Three types of fakes (2015, background): “Critics see a world without editors, of unfettered spin, where the loudest or most agreeable voice wins and where truth is the first casualty” (Kovach & Rosentiel, 2010, p. 7).”