Biomass as a Source of Renewable Carbon for Iron and Steelmaking

By T. Norgate, N. Haque, M. Somerville, S. Jahanshahi. 2012

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Fossil fuel-based carbon is widely used in iron and steelmaking in a number of forms, and the replacement of these materials with renewable carbon derived from biomass is seen as offering the greatest potential to reduce the greenhouse gas footprint of steel production. Life cycle assessment methodology has been used to estimate the greenhouse gas footprint of charcoal production from biomass, as well as the potential reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from the use of charcoal from biomass in the integrated, mini-mill/EAF and direct smelting steelmaking routes. The results indicated that the use of charcoal in the integrated steelmaking route in likely applications and substitution rates has the potential to reduce the greenhouse gas footprint of steel by 0.69–1.21 t CO2e/t steel (or 31–57%) without any charcoal production by-product (bio-oil and electricity) credits, and by 0.91–1.61 t CO2e/t steel (42–74%) with these by-product credits included. The corresponding reductions for the mini-mill/EAF and direct smelting routes were 0.028–0.056 t CO2e/t steel (5.5–11%) and 0.34–1.70 t CO2e/t steel (16–80%) without by-product credits, and 0.037–0.075 t CO2e/t steel (7.3–14.7%) and 0.45–2.25 t CO2e/t steel (21–106%) with by-product credits respectively. However, the magnitude of the by-product credits depends on the by-product yields in the charcoal retort, which in turn are dependent on a number of factors, in particular, the nature of the pyrolysis process (fast or slow) and the biomass feed composition. Estimates of the potential plantation areas available to grow the biomass required to produce charcoal for steelmaking purposes in a sustainable manner, together with estimates of sources of biomass residues suggest that it is possible that an appreciable amount of the world’s steel production can utilise charcoal in place of coal or coke over the coming decades. However, transportation is expected to be a significant issue affecting the cost of charcoal delivered to steel plants in all biomass source scenarios. Other issues such as technical aspects of charcoal use in steelmaking and economics will also play a significant role in the uptake of charcoal from biomass as a source of renewable carbon for iron and steelmaking.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a2c6c1b164b4b5b74f66d0908ad04c244066e4f0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

In Environmental Engineering

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Citations in the corpus

The feasibility of 100% renewable electricity systems: A response to critics (2018, methodology): “obtained without CO2 emissions from biomass [141], as it was in several countries in World War 2, and also potentially by electrolysis”
Reducing industrial energy demand in the UK: A review of energy efficiency technologies and energy saving potential in selected sectors (2018, background): “Due to much lower mechanical strength of bio-coke compared to coke, in practice it is impossible to operate large blast furnaces with 100% substitution of bio-coke for coke, with substitution rates up to 20% being considered reasonable [135].”
The potential of using biomass-based reducing agents in the blast furnace: A review of thermochemical conversion technologies and assessments related to sustainability (2013, unknown): “8, GHG emissions (gCO 2 e/MJ) related to production of charcoal, bio-oil and Bio-SNG are presented [69,137,142,146 – 149].”