A 10 μm spectroscopic survey of Herbig Ae star disks: Grain growth and crystallization

By R. van Boekel, M. Min, L. Waters, A. D. Koter, C. Dominik, M. V. D. Ancker, J. Bouwman. 2005

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present spectroscopic observations of a large sample of Herbig Ae stars in the 10 µm spectral region. We perform compositional fits of the spectra based on properties of homogeneous as well as inhomogeneous spherical particles, and derive the mineralogy and typical grain sizes of the dust responsible for the 10 µm emission. Several trends are reported that can constrain theoretical models of dust processing in these systems: i) none of the sources consists of fully pristine dust comparable to that found in the interstellar medium; ii) all sources with a high fraction of crystalline silicates are dominated by large grains; iii) the disks around more massive stars (M > 2.5 M� , L > 60 L� ) have a higher fraction of crystalline silicates than those around lower mass stars, iv) in the subset of lower mass stars (M < 2.5 M� ) there is no correlation between stellar parameters and the derived crystallinity of the dust. The correlation between the shape and strength of the 10 micron silicate feature reported by van Boekel et al. (2003) is reconfirmed with this larger sample. The evidence presented in this paper is combined with that of other studies to present a likely scenario of dust processing in Herbig Ae systems. We conclude that the present data favour a scenario in which the crystalline silicates are produced in the innermost regions of the disk, close to the star, and transported outward to the regions where they can be detected by means of 10 micron spectroscopy. Additionally, we conclude that the final crystallinity of these disks is reached very soon after active accretion has stopped.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Spectroscopy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a2afacbbc2f5f20617b30898693450246ebda9f1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. S. Andrews
  2. D. Wilner
  3. T. Birnstiel
  4. C. Dullemond
  5. Jonathan P. Williams
  6. A. Hughes
  7. Anders Johansen
  8. C. Qi

In Spectroscopy

  1. S. Andrews
  2. D. Wilner
  3. T. Birnstiel
  4. C. Dullemond
  5. A. Hughes
  6. N. Calvet
  7. Catherine C. Espaillat
  8. L. Hartmann

Citations in the corpus