An optimization of the Icosahedral grid modified by spring dynamics
By Hirofumi Tomita, Masaki Satoh, Koji Goto. 2002
105 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a293258d94a939d4a7f3742cfb10ab6787f1d37f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Oceanography
- John Thuburn
- Andrew Staniforth
- Masaki Satoh
- Hirofumi Tomita
- David L. Williamson
- Takemasa Miyoshi
- Masaru Kunii
Citations in the corpus
- The Non-hydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model: description and development (2014, methodology): “Two unique characteristics of the NICAM dynamical core are the use of the spring dynamics to construct a modified icosahedral grid (Tomita et al. 2001, 2002) and the use of a flux form non-hydrostatic system which guarantees conservation of mass and energy (Satoh 2002, 2003).”
- A new dynamical framework of nonhydrostatic global model using the icosahedral grid (2004, methodology): “In the course of the development of the full AGCM, we have reported the development of a shallow water model based on the icosahedral grid with the improvement of numerical accuracy of the diGerential operators and homogeneity of the grid system (Tomita et al., 2001, 2002).”
- The Evolution of Dynamical Cores for Global Atmospheric Models(125th Anniversary Issue of the Meteorological Society of Japan) (2007, background): “The degree of the problem and many of the attempts to address it are summarized in Williamson (1992). Shape preserving semi-Lagrangian methods were developed to avoid this problem as well as the more general problem of over- and under-shooting (Williamson and Rasch 1989).”
- A global cloud‐resolving simulation: Preliminary results from an aqua planet experiment (2005, background): “The horizontal grid is a modified icosahedral grid [Tomita et al., 2002].”
- Horizontal grids for global weather and climate prediction models: a review (2012, methodology): “Of the hexagonal A to E grids examined by Nic̆ković et al. (2002), two have the right numbers of degrees of freedom to avoid branches of computational modes: the hexagonal A-grid, like the square A-grid, has poor inertio-gravity wave dispersion; the reduced C-grid, which omits every third velocity ”