The New Higher Level Classification of Eukaryotes with Emphasis on the Taxonomy of Protists

By S. Adl, A. Simpson, M. A. Farmer, R. Andersen, O. Anderson, John R Barta, S. Bowser, G. Brugerolle, R. Fensome, S. Fredericq and 18 more. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 2005

1,713 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Paleontology, Parasitology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a283651b716e32dfe1c51189317f41daf93110a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

1. Daniel H. Huson
2. Eugene V. Koonin
3. Andrew H. Knoll
4. Monika Balvociute
5. Yuri I. Wolf
6. E. Mitchell
7. Frank Oliver Glöckner
8. Jörg Peplies

In Paleontology

1. R. Summons
2. Andrew H. Knoll
3. Daniel J. G. Lahr
4. J. Pawłowski
5. Debashish Bhattacharya
6. Wolfgang Ludwig
7. Daniel H. Huson
8. Pablo Yarza

In Parasitology

1. David Bass
2. Eugene V. Koonin

Citations in the corpus

• Grammar of protein domain architectures (2019, background): “Under this root placement, the eukaryotic tree consists of three major clades: ( i ) bikonts, which include Archaeplastida (Viridiplantae and Rho-dophyta) and Apicomplexa; ( ii ) unikonts (Amoebozoa, fungi, and animals); and ( iii ) Excavata (Diplomonadida and Kinetoplastida) (74, 76).”
• SILVA, RDP, Greengenes, NCBI and OTT — how do these taxonomies compare? (2017, background): “…rank information for Archaea and Bacteria is obtained from Bergey’s Taxonomic Outlines [10–13] and from the List of Prokaryotic Names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) [14], whereas eukaryotic taxonomy is based on the consensus views of the International Society of Pro-tistologists [15, 16].”
• The revised classification of eukaryotes (2012, methodology): “● Chloroplastida Adl et al. 2005 [Viridiplantae Cavalier-Smith 1981; Chlorobionta Jeffrey 1982, emend.”
• Atlas of Benthic Foraminifera (2013, background): “Taxonomy Benthic foraminifera belong to a large group of marine “amoeboid” protists, recently classified as a stand-alone phylum within the eukaryote Supergroup Rhizaria in the Protist Kingdom (Adl et al., 2005).”
• DEFINING THE MAJOR LINEAGES OF RED ALGAE (RHODOPHYTA) 1 (2006, background): “…into two phyla because this group, including the cyanidiophytes, is phylogenetically distinct in eukaryotic trees (Rodrı́guezEzpeleta et al. 2005) and they share important biochemical features with other red algae such as the biosynthesis of floridean starch in the cytoplasm (Barbier et al. 2005).”
• Testate Amoebae and Nutrient Cycling with Particular Reference to Soils (2010, background): “The testate amoebae form a polyphyletic group traditionally placed in the phylum Rhizopoda ( Margulis and Chapman 2009 ), but now separated in two different Eukaryote supergroups, the Amoebozoa (for the Arcellinida) and the Rhizaria (for the Euglpyhida and other testate amoebae with filose pseudopod”
• Phylogeny and Molecular Evolution of the Green Algae (2012, neutral): “2005 ), or simply “green plants” (Sluiman et al , 1983 ) or “green lineage.”