Do Rosenblatt and Nataf isoprobabilistic transformations really differ
By Régis Lebrun, Anne Dutfoy. 2009
167 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a25b05253fda34a8f4e4e29d928f83e93993d95c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
- Dianqing Li
- Xiao-Song Tang
- Kok-Kwang Phoon
- Chuangbing Zhou
- Yi‐Feng Chen
- G. Em Karniadakis
- Daniele Venturi
- Heyrim Cho
In Statistics and Probability
- Dianqing Li
- Xiao-Song Tang
- Kok-Kwang Phoon
- Chuangbing Zhou
- Daniele Venturi
- G. Em Karniadakis
- Yi‐Feng Chen
- Heyrim Cho
Citations in the corpus
- Copula-based approaches for evaluating slope reliability under incomplete probability information (2015, unknown): “, [8,24,22,16]).”
- Karhunen-Loève expansion for multi-correlated stochastic processes (2013, methodology): “formed into a set of uncorrelated normal random variables by using Nataf transformation [43].”
- Impact of copulas for modeling bivariate distributions on system reliability (2013, unknown): “[9] Lebrun R, Dutfoy A.”
- Bivariate simulation using copula and its application to probabilistic pile settlement analysis (2013, methodology): “Lebrun and Dutfoy [11,12] pointed out that conventional reliability methods, such as first-order reliability method (FORM) and second-order reliability method (SORM), applying the Nataf transformation [14] in dealing with non-Gaussian data, can be derived from the copula theory using the Gaussian co”