Revisiting the omitted variables argument: Substantive vs. statistical adequacy
By Aris Spanos. 2006
47 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a24ec96a4e6786bdc3b23afa486b9ae324a32528
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Peter Spirtes
- Jiji Zhang
- Aris Spanos
- Marloes H. Maathuis
- Jakob Runge
- Jan Peters
- Joris M. Mooij
- Peter Buhlmann
In Economics and Econometrics
In Statistics and Probability
- Jiji Zhang
- Peter Spirtes
- Aris Spanos
- Peter Buhlmann
- Jan Peters
- Jakob Runge
- Marloes H. Maathuis
- Diego Colombo
Citations in the corpus
- Akaike-type criteria and the reliability of inference: Model selection versus statistical model specification (2010, methodology): “…that both substantive and statistical information play important roles in learning from data, and in practice empirical models constitute an amalgam of both sources of information, but the role of each type of information has not been delineated in modern statistics; Lehmann (1990), Spanos (2006a).”
- Detection of Unfaithfulness and Robust Causal Inference (2008, background): “To test the CFC, intuitively, one needs information about the causal structure in the first place (see Spanos 2006 for an example of testing the CFC with assumptions about causal structure).”