Structure-Preserving Color Normalization and Sparse Stain Separation for Histological Images

By Abhishek Vahadane, Tingying Peng, A. Sethi, Shadi Albarqouni, Lichao Wang, Maximilian Baust, K. Steiger, A. Schlitter, I. Esposito, Nassir Navab. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2016

759 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Staining and scanning of tissue samples for microscopic examination is fraught with undesirable color variations arising from differences in raw materials and manufacturing techniques of stain vendors, staining protocols of labs, and color responses of digital scanners. When comparing tissue samples, color normalization and stain separation of the tissue images can be helpful for both pathologists and software. Techniques that are used for natural images fail to utilize structural properties of stained tissue samples and produce undesirable color distortions. The stain concentration cannot be negative. Tissue samples are stained with only a few stains and most tissue regions are characterized by at most one effective stain. We model these physical phenomena that define the tissue structure by first decomposing images in an unsupervised manner into stain density maps that are sparse and non-negative. For a given image, we combine its stain density maps with stain color basis of a pathologist-preferred target image, thus altering only its color while preserving its structure described by the maps. Stain density correlation with ground truth and preference by pathologists were higher for images normalized using our method when compared to other alternatives. We also propose a computationally faster extension of this technique for large whole-slide images that selects an appropriate patch sample instead of using the entire image to compute the stain color basis.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Biophysics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a243c7bbd2affd548e18a35dadf0313c1b2198c2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Simon Graham
  2. Nasir M. Rajpoot
  3. Faisal Mahmood
  4. Ming Y. Lu
  5. Drew F. K. Williamson
  6. P. Heng
  7. Usha R. Acharya
  8. Filippo Molinari

In Biophysics

  1. Faisal Mahmood
  2. Ming Y. Lu
  3. Drew F. K. Williamson
  4. Simon Graham
  5. Ehsan Khodapanah Aghdam
  6. Dinggang Shen
  7. Nassir Navab
  8. Moein Heidari

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. P. Heng
  2. Hao Chen
  3. Faisal Mahmood
  4. Richard J. Chen
  5. Usha R. Acharya
  6. Reza Azad
  7. Shadi Albarqouni
  8. Christoph Baur

Citations in the corpus