Performance Analysis of Private Blockchain Platforms in Varying Workloads

By Suporn Pongnumkul, Chaiyaphum Siripanpornchana, S. Thajchayapong. International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, 2017

345 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Performance Analysis of Hyperledger Fabric Platforms (2018, methodology): “A recent study [48] measured the performance of two permissioned blockchain implementations: Ethereum and Hyperledger Fabric, by varying the number of transactions (from 1 to 10000 transactions).”
FastFabric: Scaling Hyperledger Fabric to 20,000 Transactions per Second (2019, neutral): “Similarly, Pongnumkul et al [20] compare the performance of Fabric and Ethereum for a cryptocurrency workload, finding that Fabric outperforms Ethereum in all metrics.”
A Vademecum on Blockchain Technologies: When, Which, and How (2019, background): “a blockchain can revolutionize a business [38], [39], [73], benefits and drawbacks of both permissioned and permissionless blockchains [36], [45], [74], [75], [76], and links with traditional solutions [3], [77], [78], [79], [80].”
A Survey of IoT Applications in Blockchain Systems (2020, background): “Private blockchains [Brown et al. 2016; Pongnumkul et al. 2017] only allow authentic nodes to join the blockchain network.”