Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)‐round V
By John Moult, Krzysztof Fidelis, Adam T. Zemla, Tim J. P. Hubbard. 2003
207 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Materials Chemistry
- Torsten Schwede
- Yang Zhang
- Andriy Kryshtafovych
- Ben M. Webb
- Andrej Sali
- Liam J. McGuffin
- Björn Wallner
- Jianlin Cheng
In Molecular Biology
- Torsten Schwede
- Yang Zhang
- Liam J. McGuffin
- Björn Wallner
- Andrej Sali
- Andriy Kryshtafovych
- Ben M. Webb
- Arne Elofsson
Citations in the corpus
- Critical Assessment of Methods of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) – Progress and New directions in Round XI (2016, background): “(6) A first assessment demonstrates that models can sometimes successfully address biological questions that motivate experimental structure determination.”
- A Deep Learning Network Approach to ab initio Protein Secondary Structure Prediction (2014, neutral): “CASP (critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction) identifies Sov as being a more appropriate measure of prediction accuracy, though we have not found any studies investigating the relative effect of Q3 versus Sov scores on tertiary structure prediction itself[31, 32].”
- CAPRI: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions (2003, background): “Protein docking and structure prediction substantially overlap, and many groups in the docking community recognized the potential gains from a CASP-like experiment.(6) A blind docking prediction should start from the known X-ray or NMR structures of two proteins and end with a comparison to a struct”
- Exploiting evolutionary relationships for predicting protein structures (2003, methodology): “One such experiment, the Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) (Moult et al., 1995, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2003), clearly represents one of the most important events in the history of protein structure prediction and of the interaction between the experimental and computational…”
- Ranking predicted protein structures with support vector regression (2007, unknown): “We use the GDT_TS measure,17 which is used in the CASP evaluation,18 as the criterion to judge the quality of a structure.”
- Assessing computational tools for the discovery of transcription factor binding sites (2005, methodology): “© 2005 N a t u r e P ub li s h i ng G r oup h tt p : // www . n a t u r e . c o m / n a t u r e b i o t ec hno l og y A N A LY S I S used in the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction 22 ).”