Delay efficient sleep scheduling in wireless sensor networks

By Gang Lu, Narayanan Sadagopan, Bhaskar Krishnamachari, Ashish Goel. Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies., 2005

342 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

RMAC: A Routing-Enhanced Duty-Cycle MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks (2007, background): “[19] have proved that in the presence of arbitrary communication, scheduling wakeups in order to minimize the end-to-end delay is NP-hard.”
Opportunistic Flooding in Low-Duty-Cycle Wireless Sensor Networks with Unreliable Links (2009, background): “While pioneering projects have been proposed for lowduty-cycle unicasts [8, 24, 47], research is surprisingly inadequate for low-duty-cycle flooding, an important function for disseminating network-wide commands, alerts and configurations [11], time synchronization [25], and code binaries [14].”
Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks: A survey (2009, background): “Several other sleep/wakeup schemes that still leverage the tree-network organization have been considered and analyzed [84,86].”
Achieving Real-Time Target Tracking UsingWireless Sensor Networks (2006, background): “Lu [Lu et al. 2005] studies how to minimize the communication latency given that each sensor has a duty cycling requirement of being awake for only 1 k time slots on average.”