The contribution of cephalopods to global marine fisheries: can we have our squid and eat them too?

By M. Hunsicker, T. Essington, R. Watson, U. R. Sumaila. 2010

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a21ee209d34f662d29278ac5bb0cdb8bbf45431f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. G. Pecl
2. Graham J. Pierce
3. Y. Cherel
4. N. Moltschaniwskyj
5. O. Katugin
6. V. Laptikhovsky
7. Xinjun Chen
8. P. Richard

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. G. Pecl
2. N. Moltschaniwskyj
3. Rui Rosa
4. R. Villanueva
5. A. Arkhipkin
6. Y. Cherel
7. V. Laptikhovsky
8. Xinjun Chen

In Global and Planetary Change

1. G. Pecl
2. Graham J. Pierce
3. Y. Cherel
4. N. Moltschaniwskyj
5. O. Katugin
6. V. Laptikhovsky
7. Xinjun Chen
8. Hassan Moustahfid

Citations in the corpus

• Future challenges in cephalopod research* (2014, background): “In the same way, the only published investigation on concentric eye lens layers reveals variations in d13C and d15N values at fine temporal scales, indicating substantial variability in squid feeding patterns (Hunsicker et al., 2010a).”
• World Squid Fisheries (2015, background): “Hunsicker et al. (2010) point out that the expansion of fisheries to lower trophic level species, such as squids, is not necessarily the equivalent of an expansion to lesser value species as further discussed by Pauly et al. (1998).”