Architectural Mismatch: Why Reuse Is Still So Hard 25t h- a nniver sa r y to p p icks

By David Garlan, Robert Allen, J. Ockerbloom. 2009

440 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a21a7a9ed030f475667963ac226a57307fde367b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Sven Apel
2. Christian Kästner
3. Gunter Saake
4. Don S. Batory
5. Wing Lam
6. Thomas Thüm
7. Ina Schaefer
8. Krzysztof Czarnecki

Citations in the corpus

• Feature-Oriented Software Product Lines (2013, background): “In fact, reusing components from markets is often problematic, because their architectural assumptions mismatch (Garlan et al. 1995).”
• Barriers to e-government integration (2005, background): “Differences in architecture are a major reason for failure in application integration (Garlan et al., 1995).”