Machine learning, medical diagnosis, and biomedical engineering research - commentary

By Kenneth R. Foster, Robert Koprowski, Joseph D. Skufca. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 2014

324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A large number of papers are appearing in the biomedical engineering literature that describe the use of machine learning techniques to develop classifiers for detection or diagnosis of disease. However, the usefulness of this approach in developing clinically validated diagnostic techniques so far has been limited and the methods are prone to overfitting and other problems which may not be immediately apparent to the investigators. This commentary is intended to help sensitize investigators as well as readers and reviewers of papers to some potential pitfalls in the development of classifiers, and suggests steps that researchers can take to help avoid these problems. Building classifiers should be viewed not simply as an add-on statistical analysis, but as part and parcel of the experimental process. Validation of classifiers for diagnostic applications should be considered as part of a much larger process of establishing the clinical validity of the diagnostic technique.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Health Information Management, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a20f94ee49d9f29720cf9555457e1fea9050c0b2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Kush R. Varshney
  2. Rick Salay
  3. Krzysztof Czarnecki
  4. Cynthia Rudin

In Health Information Management

  1. Kush R. Varshney

In Molecular Biology

  1. Kush R. Varshney

Citations in the corpus