Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical…

By M. Cerqueira, N. Weissman, V. Dilsizian, A. Jacobs, S. Kaul, W. Laskey, D. Pennell, J. Rumberger, T. Ryan, M. Verani. Circulation, 2002

4,566 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a20a63b283ac8c044823cbc538e7729eca35ab8f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Daniel Rueckert
2. Wenjia Bai

In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

1. Daniel Rueckert

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

1. Daniel Rueckert
2. Wenjia Bai
3. Arvid Lundervold
4. Peter Kellman

Citations in the corpus

• A bi-ventricular cardiac atlas built from 1000+ high resolution MR images of healthy subjects and an analysis of shape and motion (2015, positive): “We also perform segment-wise comparison of wall thickness using the AHA 17-segment model (Cerqueira et al., 2002) and the statistics are reported in Table 4.”
• Shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (ShMOLLI) for clinical myocardial T1-mapping at 1.5 and 3 T within a 9 heartbeat breathhold (2010, methodology): “Offline post-processing involved manual tracing of endo- and epi-cardial contours for analysis of the T1 measurements in myocardial segments 1 to 16 of the American Heart Association (AHA) 17-segment model [16] using in-house software.”