FINE‐TUNED PHENOTYPES: TADPOLE PLASTICITY UNDER 16 COMBINATIONS OF PREDATORS AND COMPETITORS
By Rick A. Relyea. 2004
381 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1fb2b55655f42a9a0bb17c902b1df4519659c7f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- Josh R Auld
- E. Werner
- M. Ferrari
- Kerry L. Yurewicz
- Rick A. Relyea
- R. Langerhans
- Daniel Sáenz
- G. H. Dayton
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Global and Planetary Change
- M. Ferrari
- D. Chivers
- Rick A. Relyea
- Grant E. Brown
- E. Werner
- Josh R Auld
- Kerry L. Yurewicz
- R. Langerhans
Citations in the corpus
- Evolutionary ecology of inducible morphological plasticity in predator–prey interaction: toward the practical links with population ecology (2009, background): “For example, inducible defense and offense in the morphology of ciliates and larval amphibians correlate with the density (Van Buskirk and Arioli 2002; Relyea 2004) and individual performance of the interacting species (Wicklow 1988; Kopp and Tollrian 2003b; Kishida et al.”
- Turnover in an amphibian metacommunity : the role of local and regional factors (2007, background): “in timing and size at metamorphosis, morphology, physiology and behavior in response to both the physical environment and the presence of predators and competitors (Benard 2004, Relyea 2004, Van Buskirk and Arioli 2005).”
- Predator‐induced morphological defences as by‐products of prey behaviour: a review and prospectus (2012, background): “On the other hand, another study with tadpoles showed that predator-induced morphological responses were lower under low per-capita resource levels than high per capita resource levels (Relyea 2004).”
- Predator-induced changes in morphology of a prey fish: the effects of food level and temporal frequency of predation risk (2008, background): “While there are clear survival advantages to the prey, the prey also suffer considerable costs particularly in term of reduced growth and competitive ability (Pettersson and Brönmark 1997, 1999; Van Buskirk and Relyea 1998; Relyea 2004; Schoeppner and Relyea 2005).”
- Body shape, burst speed and escape behavior of larval anurans (2005, positive): “…Hoverman 2003, Laurila et al. 2004, Relyea 2004, Teplitsky et al. 2004, 2005, Kishida .and Nishimura, 2005) and increases the probability of surviving predation (McCollum and Van Buskirk 1996, Van Buskirk et al. 1997, Van Buskirk and Relyea 1998, Relyea and Hoverman 2003, Teplitsky et al. 2005).”
- THE IMPACT OF INSECTICIDES AND HERBICIDES ON THE BIODIVERSITY AND PRODUCTIVITY OF AQUATIC COMMUNITIES (2006, background): “(2) The insecticides will reduce the diversity and abundance of insects (USDI [U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service] 1980) and zooplankton (Havens 1994, 1995), but will have no direct impact on the snails and tadpoles (Relyea 2003b, 2004).”
- PREDATOR- AND COMPETITOR-INDUCED PLASTICITY: HOW CHANGES IN FORAGING MORPHOLOGY AFFECT PHENOTYPIC TRADE-OFFS (2005, methodology): “In the current study, this suggests that the tadpole mouth responses are not threshold responses that respond to environmental variation in a step-wise fashion, but fine-tuned responses to the two opposing forces of predation and competition (Relyea 2004).”
- Fish and dragonfly nymph predators induce opposite shifts in color and morphology of tadpoles (2008, background): “We may even expect predator-specific color responses by prey, as has been documented for morphological traits (Relyea 2001, 2003, 2004).”