Selection of ground motion time series and limits on scaling
By Jennie A. Watson-Lamprey, N. Abrahamson. 2006
258 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1f5daf03d7d910db46af7b001a49b75b4f08edb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- Quantification of model uncertainty and variability in Newmark displacement analysis (2018, methodology): “[PGA, Sa(T= 1)] WA06 model by Watson-Lamprey and Abrahamson [22]: = + = − + = − + − + = − = + − + − − = + D S T s S T s S T s PGA S T s PGA σ ln (5.47 0.451(ln( ( 1 )) 0.45) 0.0186(ln( ( 1 )) 0.45) 0.596(ln(A ) 1) 0.656( ln ( ( 1 )/ )) 0.0716( ln ( ( 1 )/ ) ) 0.802(ln(Dur ) 0.74) 0.0763(ln(Dur ) 0.7”
- Strong ground motion record selection for the reliable prediction of the mean seismic collapse capacity of a structure group (2011, background): “SDOF systems) for the selection of suitable SGMRs for the analysis of sophisticated structures was dealt with in previous investigations [14, 15].”
- Conditional Spectrum Computation Incorporating Multiple Causal Earthquakes and Ground-Motion Prediction Models (2013, unknown): “One common approach involves selecting ground motions whose response spectra match the target spectrum (e.g., Watson-Lamprey and Abrahamson, 2006; Beyer and Bommer, 2007; ASCE, 2010; ATC, 2011).”