Boundary loss for highly unbalanced segmentation

By Hoel Kervadec, Jihene Bouchtiba, Christian Desrosiers, Eric Granger, Jose Dolz, Ismail Ben Ayed. International Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, 2018

736 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Widely used loss functions for CNN segmentation, e.g., Dice or cross-entropy, are based on integrals over the segmentation regions. Unfortunately, for highly unbalanced segmentations, such regional summations have values that differ by several orders of magnitude across classes, which affects training performance and stability. We propose a boundary loss, which takes the form of a distance metric on the space of contours, not regions. This can mitigate the difficulties of highly unbalanced problems because it uses integrals over the interface between regions instead of unbalanced integrals over the regions. Furthermore, a boundary loss complements regional information. Inspired by graph-based optimization techniques for computing active-contour flows, we express a non-symmetric L2 distance on the space of contours as a regional integral, which avoids completely local differential computations involving contour points. This yields a boundary loss expressed with the regional softmax probability outputs of the network, which can be easily combined with standard regional losses and implemented with any existing deep network architecture for N-D segmentation. We report comprehensive evaluations and comparisons on different unbalanced problems, showing that our boundary loss can yield significant increases in performances while improving training stability. Our code is publicly available1.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Neurology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1e392a596bc2f34fe34dddf79ee11c20fe5d00e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Tao Lei
  2. Colin P. Elkin
  3. Evis Sala
  4. Asoke Kumar Nandi
  5. Laura Jeyaseelan
  6. Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb
  7. Nima Tajbakhsh
  8. Jeffrey N. Chiang

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Tao Lei
  2. Colin P. Elkin
  3. Evis Sala
  4. Asoke Kumar Nandi
  5. Laura Jeyaseelan
  6. Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb
  7. Nima Tajbakhsh
  8. Jeffrey N. Chiang

In Neurology

  1. Colin P. Elkin
  2. V. Devabhaktuni
  3. Sidike Paheding
  4. Nahian Alam Siddique

Citations in the corpus