A comparison of bug finding tools for Java

By Nick Rutar, Christian B. Almazan, Jeffrey S. Foster. IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, 2004

314 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Software, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1bbfcd8f2ca07d671cd940b5971efad1064d9fc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

1. Laurie A. Williams
2. William W. Pugh
3. Michael W. Hicks
4. David Hovemeyer
5. N. Nagappan
6. Michelle L. Mazurek
7. Jeffrey S. Foster
8. Romain Robbes

In Software

1. Laurie A. Williams
2. William W. Pugh
3. Michael W. Hicks
4. David Hovemeyer
5. N. Nagappan
6. Jeffrey S. Foster
7. Ahmed E. Hassan
8. Westley Weimer

In Signal Processing

1. Michael W. Hicks
2. Michelle L. Mazurek
3. Jordan L. Boyd-Graber
4. Westley Weimer
5. Joseph Bonneau

Citations in the corpus

• On the value of static analysis for fault detection in software (2006, background): “Basili et al. [3] proposed a classification scheme in research on requirements defects.”
• Understanding security mistakes developers make: Qualitative analysis from Build It, Break It, Fix It (2020, methodology): “We could invest more in automated vulnerability discovery tools [5,9,10,24,49,67,72,75,76].”
• Finding bugs is easy (2004, background): “Rutar et. al. [ 40 ] compare a number of tools for finding bugs in Java programs.”