Agricultural sector analysis on greenhouse gas mitigation in US agriculture and forestry.

By Uwe A. Schneider, Bruce A. McCarl, Erwin Schmid. 2007

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a19811bbb3e158a8f9aafde4a0bd5527bdae9f7c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Thomas Heckelei
2. Wolfgang Britz
3. Yinan Zhang
4. S. Cara
5. A. Cowie
6. Erwin Schmid
7. Luca Montanarella
8. S. Leduc

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. Thomas Heckelei
2. Wolfgang Britz
3. Yinan Zhang
4. S. Cara
5. Mario Herrero
6. Hendrik Wolff

In Global and Planetary Change

1. S. Cara
2. Wolfgang Britz
3. Mario Herrero
4. Yinan Zhang
5. Thomas Heckelei
6. Erwin Schmid
7. Steffen Fritz
8. Luca Montanarella

Citations in the corpus

• Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets (2011, methodology): “The general concept and structure of GLOBIOM is similar to the US Agricultural Sector and Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas (ASMGHG) model (Schneider et al., 2007).”
• Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions (2014, background): “Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(46):19645–19648.”
• Potential synergies between existing multilateral environmental agreements in the implementation of land use, land-use change and forestry activities (2007, background): “More generally, the aforementioned relatively low elasticity of food commodity demand is likely to shift economic welfare from consumers of agricultural commodities to producers (Schneider et al., 2007).”
• Positive Mathematical Programming Approaches – Recent Developments in Literature and Applied Modelling (2012, methodology): “Besides Aropaj, the programming models of the McCarl school (Schneider et al., 2007: FASOM; Schneider and Schwab, 2006: 1 We would like to thank (in alphabetical order) for filling out the questionnaire and clarifying further questions to the model: Filippo Arfini, University Parma/IT, FIPIM; Ali…”
• Marginal abatement costs of greenhouse gas emissions from European agriculture, cost effectiveness, and the EU non-ETS burden sharing agreement (2011, unknown): “, 2010), and partial or general equilibrium models (McCarl & Schneider, 2001; Schneider et al., 2007; Pérez Domínguez et al., 2009; Golub et al., 2009).”
• Linking an economic model for European agriculture with a mechanistic model to estimate nitrogen and carbon losses from arable soils in Europe (2008, background): “For example Schneider et al. (2007) present an analysis of mitigation options in USA agriculture and forestry, with a biophysical model predicting GHG emission coefficients and carbon stock changes for various management options.”