TinyOS: An Operating System for Sensor Networks
By P. Levis, Samuel Madden, Joseph Polastre, Robert Szewczyk, Kamin Whitehouse, Alec Woo, David E. Gay, Jason L. Hill, Matt Welsh, Eric A. Brewer and 1 more. European Conference on Ambient Intelligence, 2005
1,593 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a196e25d2b9b54706ec21aa15d08568c90eb9ae4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Gilman Tolle
- Ala Al-Fuqaha
- M. Mohammadi
- Mohsen Guizani
- Stephen Dawson-Haggerty
- Benjamin Ransford
- David E. Culler
- Xiaofan Fred Jiang
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Adnan M. Abu-Mahfouz
- Ala Al-Fuqaha
- Kevin Fu
- Mohsen Guizani
- Dana Hughes
- David E. Culler
- Benjamin Ransford
- Jacob M. Sorber
Citations in the corpus
- IoT Elements, Layered Architectures and Security Issues: A Comprehensive Survey (2018, methodology): “There are many types of operating systems that are used like Tiny OS [28], Lite OS [29], Android, etc.”
- Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications (2015, background): “TinyOS [37], LiteOS [38] and Riot OS [39] also offer light”
- A Survey on Software-Defined Wireless Sensor Networks: Challenges and Design Requirements (2017, background): “TinySDN is based on TinyOS [144], [145], a sensor network based OS.”
- sMAP: a simple measurement and actuation profile for physical information (2010, methodology): “These are used in the blip package which provides UDP and TCP interfaces on devices running TinyOS [21]; an evaluation of the full http/tcp/blip implementation is presented in Section 4.2.1.”
- Interoperability in Internet of Things: Taxonomies and Open Challenges (2018, background): “There are currently many different OSs developed specifically for IoT devices such as Contiki(8), RIOT(9), TinyOS [29] and OpenWSN [30], each with several versions, to deliver services to users.”
- Convergence of MANET and WSN in IoT Urban Scenarios (2013, background): “1 and hosting the CTP implementation [14], [20], [21].”
- Control: A perspective (2014, background): “A key development was the TinyOS open source operating system [423,155] which has facilitated much experimentation by academic researchers.”
- Wireless sensor network for structural health monitoring: A contemporary review of technologies, challenges, and future direction (2019, background): “Therefore, four main functions have to be involved in OS of wireless sensor nodes.(42) (a) Low-power consumption: Power management and computing power allocation must be the fundamental concern of OS.”
- Energy Management-as-a-Service Over Fog Computing Platform (2015, background): “It overcomes the gap between the physical world and their representation in information systems [28]–[33].”
- Materials that couple sensing, actuation, computation, and communication (2015, background): “At the same time, the sensor network community has begun to explore the foundations of networking and routing in these systems (23), although focusing almost exclusively on geospatial sensing applications rather than integrating sensor networks into materials.”
- Mementos: system support for long-running computation on RFID-scale devices (2011, methodology): “The Neutron operating system [10], based on TinyOS [22], uses selective software restarts to mitigate the effects of software errors.”