Interactive geometry remeshing

By Pierre Alliez, Mark Meyer, Mathieu Desbrun. International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 2002

321 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Genus zero surface conformal mapping and its application to brain surface mapping (2004, methodology): “[12], [13] compute the discrete Dirichlet energy and apply conformal parameterization for interactive geometry remeshing.”
Recent Advances in Remeshing of Surfaces (2008, unknown): “[5] is based on global parameterization.”
Global conformal surface parameterization (2003, background): “fa Z e1 ω+ b Z e2 ωja; b 2 Zg; ( 25 ) where feig are homology basis curves.”
Isotropic Remeshing of Surfaces: A Local Parameterization Approach (2003, unknown): “• lack of guarantees: the conformal parameterization [7, 9, 23, 27] has often been the method of choice for irregular surface remeshing, isotropic [2, 3] or anisotropic [1].”
Anisotropic polygonal remeshing (2003, methodology): “In a preliminary step, we build the feature skeleton [Botsch and Kobbelt 2001; Alliez et al. 2002], representing all the tagged features (creases and corners) in a graph of adjacency.”
Feature-based surface parameterization and texture mapping (2005, methodology): “The other major approach is to divide the surface into a collection of patches that can be unfolded with little stretch [Eck et al. 1995; Leeet al. 1998; Sander et al. 2001; Alliez et al. 2002; L´ evy et al. 2002; Sorkine et al. 2002].”