Insights on the Milky Way bulge formation from the correlations between kinematics and metallicity

By C. Babusiaux, A. Gómez, V. Hill, F. Royer, M. Zoccali, Frédéric Arenou, R. Fux, A. Lecureur, M. Schultheis, B. Barbuy and 2 more. 2010

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Context. Two main scenarios for the formation of the Galactic bulge are invoked, the first one through gravitational collapse or hierarchical merging of subclumps, the second through secular evolution of the Galactic disc. Aims. We aim to constrain the formation of the Galactic bulge through studies of the correlation between kinematics and metallicities in Baade's Window (l = 1°, b = -4°) and two other fields along the bulge minor axis (l = 0°, b = -6° and b = -12°). Methods. We combine the radial velocity and the [Fe/H] measurements obtained with FLAMES/GIRAFFE at the VLT with a spectral resolution of R = 20 000, plus for the Baade's Window field the OGLE-II proper motions, and compare these with published N-body simulations of the Galactic bulge. Results. We confirm the presence of two distinct populations in Baade's Window found in Hill et al. (2010, A&A, submitted): the metal-rich population presents bar-like kinematics while the metal-poor population shows kinematics corresponding to an old spheroid or a thick disc. In this context the metallicity gradient along the bulge minor axis observed by Zoccali et al. (2008, A&A, 486, 177), visible also in the kinematics, can be related to a varying mix of these two populations as one moves away from the Galactic plane, alleviating the apparent contradiction between the kinematic evidence of a bar and the existence of a metallicity gradient. Conclusions. We show evidence that the two main scenarios for the bulge formation co-exist within the Milky Way bulge.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Education, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1901ad6f3fab6af6145318506258e45027d4e81

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. O. Gerhard
  2. Joss Bland-Hawthorn
  3. Hans-Walter Rix
  4. I. Minchev
  5. Jo Bovy
  6. Timothy C. Beers
  7. C. Wegg
  8. C. Allende Prieto

In Education

  1. Joss Bland-Hawthorn
  2. O. Gerhard
  3. Geraint F. Lewis
  4. G. Zasowski
  5. P. Frinchaboy
  6. C. Babusiaux
  7. C. Kobayashi
  8. C. Allende Prieto

In Instrumentation

  1. O. Gerhard
  2. Joss Bland-Hawthorn
  3. C. Wegg
  4. I. Minchev
  5. Hans-Walter Rix
  6. M. Zoccali
  7. V. Hill
  8. C. Allende Prieto

Citations in the corpus