Phylogenetic Relationships of Spider Monkeys (Ateles) Based on Mitochondrial DNA Variation
By A. C. Collins, J. Dubach. International journal of primatology, 2000
87 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a18f3fe84819da5d32ffb818322a12ed3a67165d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Biogeographic and Ecological Forces Responsible for Speciation in Ateles (2000, methodology): “While data of Froehlich et al. (1991) supported conspecific status for these populations, there are substantial pelage (Kellogg and Goldman, 1944; Konstant et al., 1985), chromosomal (Kunkel et al., 1980; Medeiros et al., 1997), and genetic (Collins and Dubach, 2000) differences between them.”
- Taxonomy and Distributions of Mesoamerican Primates (2006, background): “The genetic analyses of Collins and Dubach (2000) included a sample from a Nicaraguan spider monkey, which, by its pelage, they tentatively identified as A. g. frontatus.”
- The Diversity of the New World Primates (Platyrrhini): An Annotated Taxonomy (2009, background): “Defler (2004) pointed out that it was not in fact isolated; it is “found in continuous forest which harbors (to the east), C.”
- The Biogeographic History of Mesoamerican Primates (2006, methodology): “Figure 8. Cladogram of Mesoamerican primates, derived in part from Collins (2004; Collins and Dubach, 2000a, b, 2001) and Cort´ es-Ortiz et al. (2003).”