International Differences in Well-Being

By E. Diener, Daniel Kahneman, John F. Helliwell. 2010

389 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a170865648b9ea515033302fae7b7d6a752097ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Richard A. Easterlin
2. Claudia Senik
3. Paul Dolan
4. Robert Metcalfe
5. Andrew E. Clark
6. R. Layard
7. Jacqueline Zweig
8. Felicia Huppert

Citations in the corpus

• Theoretical Perspectives Guiding QOL Indicator Projects (2011, background): “Other well-known measures based on positive/negative affect are the PANAS measure (Watson et al. 1988) and the SPANE (Diener et al. 2010).”
• Trust and Wellbeing (2010, neutral): “4 The range of relevant measures of subjective well-being, their validity, and their policy relevance are discussed in detail in Diener et al. (2009). 5 In the whole sample of more than 79,000 responses to the Gallup wallet question, the expected average rate of return was about 0.”
• Subjective Well-Being: A General Overview (2009, background): “In a recent study where researchers infected participants with the common cold, those who reported higher levels of well-being were more resistant to the virus (Cohen et al., 2003).”