Generation of finite almost simple groups by conjugates

By Robert M. Guralnick, Jan Saxl. 2003

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Let G be a finite almost simple group, with L = F ∗(G) the unique minimal norma subgroup ofG—soL is a finite simple group. For x ∈G, letα(x) be the minimal numbe of L-conjugates of x which generate the group 〈L,x〉. In this paper we obtain some upp bounds onα(x). Of course, this number depends on the type of L and onx. If G = Sn, then it is easy to see that α(x)= n− 1 for x a transposition and α(x) n− 1 for all nontrivial x. (See Lemma 6.1 for an improved easy estimate and [30, Theorem 4] for fu results.) Similarly, ifG is a classical group of dimension n, then one needs at least n conjugates of a pseudoreflection (here a pseudoreflection is an element whose fixed space i hyperplane). One result we shall prove is that if n 5 thenα(x) n, except for symplectic groups in even characteristic, where α(x) n+ 1. More generally, ifL is a finite simple group of Lie type of untwisted rank thanα(x) + 3, with a few explicitly determined exceptions. (Recall that the untwisted rank is the rank of the ambient algebraic g Our results are improvements on the results obtained by Hall et al. in [30]: they prov boundα(x) 8(2 + 1) in general, andα(x) 2 + 1 if x is a long root element. One motivation for studying this problem is to classify groups acting irreducibly primitively on a vector spaceV containing an element x such that dim[x,V ] is small compared to the dimension of V . This problem was considered by Gordeev [24] characteristic zero, and by Hall et al. [30] in general. One can show that a conseq of the bounds in [30] is the result, for both algebraic and finite groups, that any prim

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a166856dcdcbef3e763e8230562634d6579c6c08

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Pham Huu Tiep
  2. Gabriel Navarro
  3. Akshay Venkatesh
  4. I. Gordon
  5. Jordan S. Ellenberg
  6. Britta Spath
  7. Gunter Malle

In Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics

  1. Pham Huu Tiep
  2. Gabriel Navarro
  3. Jordan S. Ellenberg
  4. Akshay Venkatesh
  5. I. Gordon
  6. Britta Spath
  7. Gunter Malle
  8. Stephen Griffeth

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Pham Huu Tiep
  2. Gabriel Navarro
  3. Akshay Venkatesh
  4. I. Gordon
  5. Jordan S. Ellenberg
  6. Gunter Malle
  7. Britta Spath

Citations in the corpus