The Reliability and Repeatability of a Lameness Scoring System for Use as an Indicator of Welfare in Dairy Cattle
By C. Winckler, S. Willen. 2001
181 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In 16 dairy herds, a lameness scoring system which was reasonably quick and easy to use was evaluated with regard to reliability and repeatability. The ultimate aim was to include it into an on-farm welfare assessment protocol. Locomotion scores in individual cows (n = 206) were significantly correlated with the heel and sole disorder indices obtained at routine claw trimmings (e.g. index for hind limb lesions: r s = 0.40, p = 0.0001; Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficients). The inclusion of lesions caused by digital dermatitis increased correlation coefficients when hind limbs and all four feet were considered (r s = 0.47/0.50). The inter-observer repeatability of locomotion scores in individual cows was high, and the variation between observers was low when calculated as a percentage of animals within each scoring class. Thus the locomotion scoring system proved to be a useful tool for assessing lameness, and as such a valuable part of on-farm welfare assessment in dairy cattle. It is recommended that scoring be performed at least twice during the housing period.
Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a159425046df42b582e3835536ea7cf16c7df575
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jens Kleinmanns
- Sandra Rose-Meierhöfer
- Lutz Plümer
- Christoph Römer
- Kathrin Hendriksen
- Wolfgang Büscher
- Maher Alsaaod
Citations in the corpus
- Electronic detection of lameness in dairy cows through measuring pedometric activity and lying behavior (2012, background): “However, this approach is time-consuming, has a lack of clear identification standards and depends on the skill of the observer in recognizing subtle locomotion anomalies (Winckler and Willen, 2001).”