Framework for analysing environmental policy integration
By Mans Nilsson, Å. Persson. 2003
211 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a14cea3d96d0ee5ef63351f9e1ac25758b9e6ff4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- Environmental policy integration in the EU’s common agricultural policy: greening or greenwashing? (2017, methodology): “In doing so it seeks to remedy the shortcoming in the literature observed by Nilsson and Persson (2003) and Feindt (2010) that studies in EPI are often constrained to single-country studies focusing on one or two dimensions of EPI only.”
- Governing local sustainability (2006, background): “However, as Nilsson and Persson (2003) have pointed out, this process of institutional learning may be best understood as a ‘double-loop’ process.”
- Governing sustainable cities (2004, background): “However, as Nilsson and Persson (2003) have pointed out, this process of institutional learning may be best understood as a ‘double-loop’ process.”
- The Governance of Climate Change Adaptation in 10 OECD Countries: Challenges and Approaches (2012, background): “…policy and governance literature refers to this challenge as ‘policy integration’ (see European Environment Agency, 2005; Feindt, 2010; Jordan & Lenschow, 2008; Lafferty, 2002, p. 13; Lenschow, 2002; Nilsson & Persson, 2003; The governance of climate change adaptation 281 Volkery et al., 2006).”