Can the New Deal's Three R's Be Rehabilitated? A Program-by-Program, County-by-County Analysis
By P. Fishback, S. Kantor, J. Wallis. 2002
118 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1401896edbbc301949cbaa9cb6cd4ab16bd3b6e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- The impact of New Deal expenditures on mobility during the Great Depression (2006, background): “In fact, Fleck (2001b,a, 1999c) and Fishback et al. (2003b) find that both relief and public works spending were positively related to unemployment in 1930.”
- Allocating the U.S. Federal Budget to the States: The Impact of the President (2006, unknown): “Finally, Fishback, Kantor, and Wallis (2003) and Fleck (2001) find evidence in support of both hypotheses.3 While the New Deal has received great attention, there is a lack of empirical studies on presidential influence after the 1974 reform.”
- The political economy of intergovernmental grants: Evidence from a maturing democracy (2007, result): “We find evidence that the grants allocation process is influenced both by economic conditions and political factors, which is consistent with the modern literature on the New Deal (Couch et al. 1998; Wallis 1998; Fishback et al. 2003).”