Analysing the Agricultural Costs and Non‐market Benefits of Implementing the Water Framework Directive

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evaluating farmers’ likely participation in a payment programme for water quality protection in the UK uplands (2013, background): “Bateman et al. (2006) and Fezzi et al. (2007) have also addressed the potential cost impacts that improved delivery of ecosystem services could impose on farm businesses.”
Hydro-economic models: concepts, design, applications, and future prospects. (2009, background): “Incorporating water quality processes will be especially important (Lefkoff and Gorelick, 1990b; Bateman et al., 2006).”
Using Choice Experiments to Explore the Spatial Distribution of Willingness to Pay for Rural Landscape Improvements (2009, background): “Although stated preference studies have been extended to investigate distance-decay effects (see, for example, Bateman et al, 2006b; Hanley et al, 2003; Pate and Loomis, 1997), the inherently spatial patterns of WTP are rarely clarified or addressed in stated preference studies (Bateman et al,…”